Globalizing The Factory Farm: International Organizations And The Spread Of Industrial Animal Agriculture
Background
On a global scale, animal products are getting more popular. In under 10 years, the worldwide consumption of animal products is expected to increase by nearly 8% (OECD-FAO, 2025a, pp. 25-26; OECD-FAO, 2025b). Even though high-income countries are already huge consumers of animal products, their consumption levels are expected to remain fairly stable, increasing by only 1%. The vast majority of this growth in animal product consumption will be driven by a predicted 14% growth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Home to roughly 85% of the world’s population, LMICs’ increasing consumption of animal products could lead to skyrocketing animal suffering, as well as considerable negative effects on the environment and human health (Drewnowski and Hooker, 2025).
Importantly, however, the expansion of food systems rooted in animal suffering is not inevitable, especially if advocates are well informed about the drivers of industrial animal agriculture. Multinational animal agriculture corporations like Tyson Foods are certainly seeking to expand their customer base, but they are not the only key actors supporting the spread of their industry.
Development finance institutions, various United Nations agencies and programs, philanthropic foundations, and major non-governmental organizations (NGOs) all directly and indirectly support the expansion of industrial animal agriculture. Together, they provide billions of dollars each year to projects focused on increasing meat, fish, egg, and dairy consumption in LMICs (Stop Financing Factory Farming, 2024; IFC, 2025). These organizations have a number of different goals, including ending poverty, achieving zero hunger, ensuring adequate nutrition, improving financial livelihoods, supporting economic development, and creating a sustainable food system, among others. Unfortunately, animal products are often the first tool these organizations reach for in order to meet these goals.
Animal advocates and food researchers alike argue that animal products are not the only means for achieving goals of food security, adequate nutrition, sustainability, economic development, and financial well-being. But in order to create a world where these international organizations are focused on promoting nutritious, affordable, and sustainable plant-based foods rather than strengthening the hold of industrial animal agriculture, animal advocates must understand how these organizations operate and how this can be changed. Moreover, it is imperative that any steps taken to reduce animal product consumption in LMICs are paired with solutions to provide nutritionally equal or better plant-based foods.
In this report, we examine the role of international organizations in the expansion of industrial animal agriculture across low- and middle-income countries, as well as the factors that influence their financial support to the animal agriculture industry. We also provide insights into the ways animal advocates can shape the decision-making of these organizations. These recommendations are informed both by the literature on this topic and, critically, by conversations with people who have worked in and alongside many of the international organizations and non-governmental organizations who exert the most influence in this space.
Notes On Terminology
Throughout this report, we use the term “international organization” to refer to development institutions, inter-governmental organizations, non-governmental organizations, and other entities that work on development issues around the world and especially in low- and middle-income countries. These organizations include groups like the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation, as well as the United Nations and related agencies.
This report focuses on LMICs, which has a specific definition based on gross national income. Details can be found in the Method section. This classification is related to and often preferred over the term “developing countries,” which has been critiqued for a number of reasons (Mahler, Holla, and Serajuddin, 2024). While we largely discuss LMICs, there may be references to “developing countries” if this is the term used by a source.
Key Findings
- International organizations’ chief concerns are nutrition and food security. The driving force behind most industrial animal agriculture projects in LMICs is concern about nutrition and food security, rather than animal welfare or environmental concerns. Large animal agriculture companies have successfully positioned their products as the solution to these core needs, enabling their global expansion. International organizations also often consider the potential of interventions like animal agriculture to drive economic development.
- Trust and relationships are essential for change. Numerous international organization insiders we spoke with emphasized that trust and personal relationships are critical to their work. For example, major investors repeatedly work with the same clients, and development organizations partially evaluate the potential success of projects based on trust built through relationships. For animal advocates aiming to make plant-based food more accessible in LMICs, building long-term, trust-based relationships with key decision-makers at international organizations is likely the most vital step.
- Support for factory farming is often hidden. While some organizations, like the International Finance Corporation, directly invest tens of millions of dollars in individual factory farming projects, many types of support offered by international organizations and development finance institutions are harder to spot. These “hidden supports” include:
- Favorable terms on loans;
- Investments in infrastructure (e.g., roads, electricity) necessary for the distribution of animal products;
- Technical advice that favors industrial agriculture;
- Laws requiring the import of low-welfare animal products; and
- Ownership stakes in meat companies.
Recommendations
- Connect with nutrition, food security, development, and international trade experts. The proliferation of factory farming around the world is driven by a number of complex factors ranging from the micronutrient profile of beef and soybeans to the legal distinction between cage-free and battery-cage eggs. These niche topics can require particular expertise to identify opportunities to stop the expansion of industrial animal agriculture while also ensuring nutritious, affordable food is accessible to all. Whether they are already in the movement or are academics and sympathetic employees of international organizations, experts in a number of areas can provide key insights to help animal advocates be better informed and more effective.
- Network with the staffers of international organizations. In our interviews with international organization insiders, personal relationships were repeatedly identified as a key way of establishing the trust necessary to form partnerships. These relationships can lead to opportunities for plant-based foods to meet needs rather than animal products. When approaching international organizations, food security and nutrition will likely be the most effective points to emphasize rather than animal welfare and environmental factors.
- Funds should support conference attendance for animal advocates focused on food systems in LMICs. The insiders we interviewed identified conferences as an excellent way to build relationships in this space, but attendance can often be cost-prohibitive for employees of animal advocacy organizations. Funders have an opportunity to help knowledgeable advocates attend conferences where influential actors make decisions. Industrial animal agriculture representatives have attended these events for years, creating a critical vacuum where animal advocacy voices should be heard.
- Advocates and researchers should familiarize themselves with tools used by development organizations and NGOs that work in this space to identify places where plant-based products can be equal or superior to animal products based on nutrition and affordability. Using tools like the “Cost of the Diet” analysis, “Fill the Nutrient Gap” analysis, and the forthcoming ENHANCE platform, nutrition and affordability comparisons could be made and plant-based ‘wins’ spotlit.
Glossary
BNDES – Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social; Brazil’s national development bank
DFI – Development finance institution
EU – European Union
FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
GNI – Gross National Income
IFC – International Finance Corporation, the private sector arm of the World Bank Group
JBS – World’s largest meat processing company
LMIC – Low- and middle-income countries
NGO – Non-governmental organization
SDG – United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
UN – United Nations
WTO – World Trade Organization
Applying These Findings
Additional resources from Faunalytics that may be helpful for advocates learning more about this topic include:
- Global Animal Slaughter Statistics & Charts
- Domination And Exploitation: Understanding Industry Costs For Chicken, Egg, And Fish Products In The United States, Brazil, And China
- Understanding The Dominance Of Industrialized Animal Farming
We understand that reports like this have a lot of information to consider and that acting on research can be challenging. Faunalytics is happy to offer pro bono support to advocates and non-profit organizations who would like guidance applying these findings to their own work. Please visit our virtual Office Hours or contact us for support.
Behind The Project
Research Team
The project’s lead author was Zach Wulderk (Faunalytics). Dr. Allison Troy (Faunalytics) reviewed and oversaw the work.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank several advocates who provided valuable input about this research throughout the process. We would also like to thank Taylor Quinn, whose insights and perspective were integral to this project. We are grateful to the Food Systems Research Fund for their generous support of this research.
Research Terminology
At Faunalytics, we strive to make research accessible to everyone. We avoid jargon and technical terminology as much as possible in our reports. If you do encounter an unfamiliar term or phrase, check out the Faunalytics Glossary for user-friendly definitions and examples.
Research Ethics Statement
As with all of Faunalytics’ original research, this study was conducted according to the standards outlined in our Research Ethics and Data Handling Policy.
Let us know what you think!
We conduct research to help advocates like you, so we really value your input on what we’re doing well and how we can do better. Take the brief (less than 2min) survey below to let us know how satisfied you were with this report.
https://osf.io/va8js/files/fy95n
Citations:
Wulderk, Z., & Troy, A. (2025). Globalizing The Factory Farm: International Organizations And The Spread Of Industrial Animal Agriculture. Faunalytics. https://faunalytics.org/globalizing-the-factory-farm-international-organizations-and-the-spread-of-industrial-animal-agriculture/

