What Makes Us Moral
Time Magazine presented a close look at human nature, including how morality develops in humans and the fundamentals and basics behind moral judgment. Specific examples of animal behavior are discussed to illustrate concepts of moral development and enforcement.
In children, there is a difference between moral judgment and social convention. Moral judgment is generally consistent from individual to individual, though moral behavior can vary dramatically.
The foundation of morality is found in empathy, a trait also displayed by non-human animals. Communities in both humans and animals are used to reinforce certain moral behavior. Specific examples of the presence and development of morality within animal groups are given to illustrate the characteristic in humans.

Citations:
Jeffrey Kluger, Time Magazine, 2007
Related Posts
- In The Spotlight
Meat Consumption, Moral Reasoning, And Age
Research shows that adult meat-eaters will ignore information that makes them uncomfortable with their diet. But is the same true for children? - In The Spotlight
Moral Expansiveness: A Way To Measure Our Altruistic Inclinations
Researchers propose a new human characteristic — moral expansiveness — to measure and predict people’s consideration for others. - In The Spotlight
Value Relevance And Who Deserves Our Moral Consideration
This philosophy paper proposes that value relevance is more adequate when assigning moral worth, and argues that speciesist logic is inconsistent. - In The Spotlight
How Moral Shock Makes An Impression
Explicit images of animal exploitation can be shocking, and they are often used by advocates for both outreach and retention. This study looks at how they work. - In The Spotlight
How Eating Meat Becomes A Moral Issue: Push And Pull
By understanding what factors in particular lead people to believe eating meat is immoral, we can prioritize the areas with greatest effect. - In The Spotlight
Circles Of Compassion: Studying The Expansion Of Moral Concern
This paper looks at the history of how moral circles have been understood and measured. It also explains four factors that help us expand our moral circles. - In The Spotlight
Cruel Nature: Harmfulness As An Important, Overlooked Dimension in Judgments of Moral Standing
In this study, researchers conducted a series of surveys to try to better understand the role of "harmfulness" in how humans perceive moral standing, especially with animals. Working from the hypothesis that animals who are perceived to have a "harmful disposition" are accorded a lower moral standing - in the same way that humans who are seen as inherently harmful are accorded less moral standing - the researchers considered different angles to better understand why such moral inconsistencies might exist. The results go beyond the usual discussions of moral agency and patiency, and shed light on an often overlooked aspect of how humans do their moral calculus. - In The Spotlight
Older Americans’ Moral Attitudes Changing
This Gallup poll examines views of U.S. adults on a number of social issues with three of them having significance to the animal protection movement. - In The Spotlight
Moral Intensity And Climate-Friendly Food Choices
Thanks to an increase in consumer awareness of climate change and its relation to food, there has been an increase in willingness to adopt climate-friendly diets such as veg*nism. - In The Spotlight
Resonance Of Moral Shocks In Abolitionist Animal Rights Advocacy
Results of a literature review indicate that the effectiveness of graphic depictions of suffering is still up for debate and is likely influenced by a number of complicating factors. - In The Spotlight
Meat Consumption In Denial Of Moral Status To Animals
People who believe that they dislike hurting animals whilst also eating meat - also dubbed the meat paradox - can overcome this contradiction by reducing moral concern for meat animals. - In The Spotlight
Attitudes On Moral Rights Of Animals
This study determined peoples' attitudes on whether animals should have the same moral rights as humans do.
- In The Spotlight
Meat Consumption, Moral Reasoning, And Age
Research shows that adult meat-eaters will ignore information that makes them uncomfortable with their diet. But is the same true for children? - In The Spotlight
Moral Expansiveness: A Way To Measure Our Altruistic Inclinations
Researchers propose a new human characteristic — moral expansiveness — to measure and predict people’s consideration for others. - In The Spotlight
Value Relevance And Who Deserves Our Moral Consideration
This philosophy paper proposes that value relevance is more adequate when assigning moral worth, and argues that speciesist logic is inconsistent. - In The Spotlight
How Moral Shock Makes An Impression
Explicit images of animal exploitation can be shocking, and they are often used by advocates for both outreach and retention. This study looks at how they work.