Consumers Misunderstand ‘Cruelty-Free’ Labeled Products
Many consumers purposefully seek out and purchase “cruelty-free” products that claim to not be tested on animals or involve child labor. However, there are currently no legal requirements for companies to adhere to the cruelty-free label. Therefore, it is possible that products claiming to be cruelty-free have been tested on animals at some point during manufacturing. This study indicates there is a need to establish a legal definition of the term “cruelty-free”, that companies should be required to adhere to the legal definition.
This study began by surveying participants’ knowledge about cruelty-free products. Participants were then provided with an article from the New York Times regarding the vagueness of the cruelty-free label. After reading the article, participants were less positive about the cruelty-free label, demonstrating that consumers who bought cruelty-free products were not always aware that this term can be misleading.
The authors concluded that consumers may be susceptible to deceptive advertising, and therefore a legal definition of ‘cruelty-free’ should be developed and enforced.

