Individualism and Nonindividualism in the Application of Nonhuman Animal Welfare to Policy
This article addresses the distinction between individualistic and non-individualistic approaches to animal welfare (i.e., whether animals are thought of as individuals or not when considering their well-being,) outlining ways in which future animal welfare science and policy can focus more on the individual.
[Abstract excerpted from original source.]
“Science-based policy making and assessments are individualistic insofar as they are sensitive to interindividual differences, intraindividual connectivity, or both. Several scientists and policymakers have argued that nonhuman animal welfare should relate to individual animals, but there are reasons for both individualistic and nonindividualistic approaches. Opportunities to develop more individualistic approaches include employing concepts such as “quality-of-life,” “welfare opportunities,” and greater stockperson flexibility.”