Students Want Option To Cut Out Animal Dissection
Survey findings from the Student’s Animal Guardian Alliance (SAGA), a project of the Animal Welfare Trust and the Humane Society of the United States, revealed that 86% of students believe that they should be given other study options in lieu of animal dissections.
Major findings from the study include:
- 86% of students think they should be given the option to use alternatives to animal dissection.
- 79% have been asked to dissect an animal in class.
- 52% would prefer to use an interactive computer program to learn about anatomy.
- 36% think that animal dissection in the classroom is unethical.
- 67% have not been given an alternative option.
As of 2007, nine states including Florida, California, Pennsylvania, New York, Rhode Island, Illinois, Virginia, Oregon, and New Jersey have laws that allow K-12 students to select non-animal alternatives. Five other states including Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Mexico, have similar policies or resolutions.
Citations:
Teenage Research Unlimited, Student’s Animal Guardian Alliance (Animal Welfare Trust), Humane Society of the United States, 2007 United States (National)

